2017-10-22 20:03:49 UTC
Homeopathic skeptics are easily debunked
They come up with the same old lines, which they've been taught
in mainstream controlled schools of learning.
The mainstream schools have long been under the control of the thought
police. The beauty of the school system was never intended to make
geniuses or thinkers but to socialise and keep thinking along certain
lines. To rule out mavericks and original thinkers and create
conformity and ridicule of anything outside mainstream thinking.
The skeptics do their best with websites such as
Various people dying supposedly because they tried to go homeopathic
or natural rather than depend on pharmaceutical drugs.
Note there aren't that many of them, maybe one or two per year that
can be construed as people dying from homeopathy, or rather giving up
their mainstream modalities in favour of some sort of alternative or
Consider OTOH the numbers of people who are killed by pharmaceutical
drugs. There are real figures in the thousands each year of people who
die from side effects of pharmaceutical drugs.
People need to do their own research and not rely on the advice of
either mainstream or alternative. There can be errors made following
either regimen -- to many pharmaceutical drugs "my doctor recommended
...." , "I just take what my doctor gives me" etc. OTOH a qualified
homeopath is usually thought to be the ideal way of approaching
homeopathy. Selecting the right remedy relies on the totality of
symptoms which a trained homeopath is good at working out.
The best homeopathic remedy takes into account as many of the symptoms
This is why mainstream scientific testing is not the best way to
determine if homeopathy works or not, because each person is
individual and giving a standard remedy to everybody isn't ideal - the
remedy needs to be individualised to the person's symptoms.
Debunking the Placebo Effect
Chemotherapy - none-evidence-based experimental drug
Oncologists routinely tell two lies:
1. "You'll be dead in x months if you don't take chemotherapy"
2. "Chemotherapy is the only option" - when there are a dozen options,
the worst of which is chemotherapy.
How scientific are orthodox cancer treatments?
Western medicine is Rockefeller medicine - all the way.
Most Scientific Research of Western Medicine Untrustable & Fraudulent,
Say Insiders and Experts
Academic oligarchy: Majority of science publishing is controlled by
just six companies
Gotzsche wrote a book published back in 2013 entitled Deadly Medicine
and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare that
exposes the drug industry for engaging in massive fraud and deception
to push deadly drugs like psych meds on the public. The system has
been so corrupted by this influence that millions of people are now
taking drugs that don't work and are extremely deadly.
How Bogus Scientific Studies Are Created
"How Bogus Scientific Studies Are Created
The pharmaceutical industry, with their total control over the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI),
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), etc. have also funded many, many
millions of dollars of bogus scientific studies. In fact, their budget
is in the billions of dollars every year!! Couple this with their
control of the media and you have the situation we are in today.
It is the Prime Directive of medical research to do two things: First,
make it appear there is "scientific evidence" for orthodox cancer
treatments, orthodox heart disease prevention treatments, etc., and
Second, make it appear there is "no scientific evidence" for
alternative cancer treatments, alternative heart disease prevention
treatments, and so on."
The Massive Flaw with the Scientific Hierarchy of Evidence
Calling the FDA, AMA and Big Pharma: What the Term Medical Mafia
The History of the Pharma-Cartel
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.