eight sexual harmonics

[David Dalton]

Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.

For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

[David Dalton]

On Apr 10, 2020, David Dalton wrote
(in

Post by David Dalton
Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.
For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

and can be identified with by everyone.

Here is a brief summary of the eight harmonics theory for those
who, like me, are reluctant to click on links in a Usenet newsgroup
post, especially http rather than https:

I have a theory of four orientations (purestraight, gay/lesbian, bisexual
by nature, and fourth orientation compatible only with bisexual by
nature of the opposite gender) and two spiritual genders, so effectively
eight harmonics (1M, 2M, 3M, 4M, 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F). However one
must also be careful to watch for transgender cases (e.g. 1MT would
be spiritually purestraight male in a female body) and multispirit
individuals, which I define not as transgender but as individuals
with more than one harmonic, generally equal number of male
and female harmonics, and usually two-spirit, e.g. 3F/2MT, but
I did come across one four-spirit individual, 1M/2M/1FT/2FT,
compatible with everyone other than 4F and 4M, so far, and a
3M/3FT or 3F/3MT would be at least partially compatible with
everybody, and if there was an eight-spirit individual they would
be optimally compatible with everyone, as would a 1M/1F/3M/3F.

When I say bisexual by nature I mean someone who feels
sexual attraction to both genders, but can be honestly either
bisexual, straight, celibate, or gay/lesbian by lifestyle choice.
When I say partially compatible I mean less likely to
stick, so a 1M is optimally compatible with a 1F but
only partially compatible with a 3F, and I think also
that a 3F is only partially compatible with a 3M but
is optimally compatible with a 4M, 3F, or 2F.

I base my theory partly on my own sexual attractions (I think
I am 4M) but I also used it, with at least one confirmed 1M/3FT
result, when I thought I had a matchmaking siddhi (paranormal
ability) from late March 8 to early March 20, 2019, which
I hope will return someday. When I say above that I came
across a 1M/2M/1FT/2FT, that was using my ability on a
picture and it has not yet been confirmed. And through
what I call assisted shaktipat I have been trying to pass
on the ability to at least a million individuals worldwide,
who should benefit from my theory. But if not, the theory
should be able to be researched and applied through surveys.
The confusing part is that many who are bisexual by nature
are straight by lifestyle choice, and some gay/lesbian (sexually
attracted to just the same gender) are dishonestly (although
unfortunately forced in some cases) trying to be bisexual or straight.

I do not believe there are asexuals, though a 4M who has had
no experience yet with 3F might think that he is.

[David Dalton]

In article

Post by David Dalton
(in

Post by David Dalton
Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.
For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

and can be identified with by everyone.
Here is a brief summary of the eight harmonics theory for those
who, like me, are reluctant to click on links in a Usenet newsgroup
I have a theory of four orientations (purestraight, gay/lesbian, bisexual
by nature, and fourth orientation compatible only with bisexual by
nature of the opposite gender) and two spiritual genders, so effectively
eight harmonics (1M, 2M, 3M, 4M, 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F). However one
must also be careful to watch for transgender cases (e.g. 1MT would
be spiritually purestraight male in a female body) and multispirit
individuals, which I define not as transgender but as individuals
with more than one harmonic, generally equal number of male
and female harmonics, and usually two-spirit, e.g. 3F/2MT, but
I did come across one four-spirit individual, 1M/2M/1FT/2FT,
compatible with everyone other than 4F and 4M, so far, and a
3M/3FT or 3F/3MT would be at least partially compatible with
everybody, and if there was an eight-spirit individual they would
be optimally compatible with everyone, as would a 1M/1F/3M/3F.
When I say bisexual by nature I mean someone who feels
sexual attraction to both genders, but can be honestly either
bisexual, straight, celibate, or gay/lesbian by lifestyle choice.
When I say partially compatible I mean less likely to
stick, so a 1M is optimally compatible with a 1F but
only partially compatible with a 3F, and I think also
that a 3F is only partially compatible with a 3M but
is optimally compatible with a 4M, 3F, or 2F.
I base my theory partly on my own sexual attractions (I think
I am 4M) but I also used it, with at least one confirmed 1M/3FT
result, when I thought I had a matchmaking siddhi (paranormal
ability) from late March 8 to early March 20, 2019, which
I hope will return someday. When I say above that I came
across a 1M/2M/1FT/2FT, that was using my ability on a
picture and it has not yet been confirmed. And through
what I call assisted shaktipat I have been trying to pass
on the ability to at least a million individuals worldwide,
who should benefit from my theory. But if not, the theory
should be able to be researched and applied through surveys.
The confusing part is that many who are bisexual by nature
are straight by lifestyle choice, and some gay/lesbian (sexually
attracted to just the same gender) are dishonestly (although
unfortunately forced in some cases) trying to be bisexual or straight.
I do not believe there are asexuals, though a 4M who has had
no experience yet with 3F might think that he is.

A 4M would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3M, 4M, 4F
but not with respect to 3F, but would be with respect to a
2F pretending to be a 3F, and also with respect to a 3MT.

And, as should be obvious from my above statements,
a 4F who has had no experience yet with a 3M might think
that she is asexual. Also some gays and some lesbians
might claim to be asexual, and are certainly asexual
with respect to the opposite gender. And some people
might be low in some hormones and could benefit from
hormone supplementation.

A 4F would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3F, 4M, 4F
but not with respect to 3M, but would be with respect to a
2M pretending to be a 3M, and also with respect to a 3FT.

[David Dalton]

In article

Post by David Dalton
In article

Post by David Dalton
I do not believe there are asexuals, though a 4M who has had
no experience yet with 3F might think that he is.

A 4M would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3M, 4M, 4F
but not with respect to 3F, but would be with respect to a
2F pretending to be a 3F, and also with respect to a 3MT.
And, as should be obvious from my above statements,
a 4F who has had no experience yet with a 3M might think
that she is asexual. Also some gays and some lesbians
might claim to be asexual, and are certainly asexual
with respect to the opposite gender. And some people
might be low in some hormones and could benefit from
hormone supplementation.
A 4F would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3F, 4M, 4F
but not with respect to 3M, but would be with respect to a
2M pretending to be a 3M, and also with respect to a 3FT.

As for non-binary people, I think they are probably
what I call multispirit, though some may be simply
transgendered (for example one I observed last
March is a 3MT, spiritually bisexual male originally
in a female body, but has partially transitioned).

[dale]

Post by David Dalton
Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.
For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

Where do ambition, validation, etc. fit in? I have an opinion but am
always looking to improve myself.

[David Dalton]

Post by dale

Post by David Dalton
Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.
For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

Where do ambition, validation, etc. fit in? I have an opinion but am
always looking to improve myself.

When I thought I had matchmaking ability from late March 8
to early March 20, 2019, I seemed to not only be able
to determine who was optimal;y sexually compatible with
someone else, but also to do personality matching, though
I haven't explored any past theories of such or tried to
come up with my own theory of such yet.

[dale]

Post by David Dalton
Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
The latest theory takes into account transgendered
and multispirit (who I define differently from
transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
individuals.
For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
God as "it". However I am considering switching to
the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

validation of ambitions?