Discussion:
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream Science
(too old to reply)
A little knowledge
2017-04-29 10:23:57 UTC
Permalink
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science



This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.



--
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing


"The U.S. government does not study anything holistically. Everything
is studied in isolation from all else."
-- The Open-Source Everything Manifesto: Transparency, Truth, and
Trust (Manifesto Series) by Robert David Steele
http://www.phibetaiota.net/2014/05/robert-steele-at-libtechnyc-the-open-source-everything-manifesto/

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/01/07/the-origin-of-education-and-mandatory-schooling/
"From an early age, we are forced into a mandatory school system that
requires and encourages youth to attend for a large portion of their
human life, for six hours a day. Each child is required to learn the
accepted version of reality in order to fit into the specific mold
desired by the elite. Just like television, a large part of school is
simply programming. It’s ironic how the same families behind the
funding are responsible for many inhumane atrocities that took place
throughout history. They are also behind big oil, big pharma, food and
other industries that are becoming more transparent as of late. Kids
who do not fit into the system and do not resonate with it are usually
labelled and medicated. Essentially, the whole point of school is to
shape the reality of the student."


http://www.collective-evolution.com/2009/09/20/understanding-vs-memorization/
" ...if we were really taught to critically think do you think we
would have the systems we have in place now? Our financial system? Our
health system and its corruption? Events like 9/11? Religions? Even
our education system for that matter. If we were actually taught to
critically think, education as we know it would collapse on itself and
a new system would be built. If we were actually taught to critically
think, the powers at be would not have the control they do now, this
is why we are sent to school from such a young age, and why fear is
used to get us to continue in our later years."

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2009/09/20/understanding-vs-memorization/
"It is important we learn to understand the information we take in and
not simply memorize it, this will allow us to break each piece of
information down to its roots and find the truth or fallacy. It is
evident we rarely do this now by simply looking at the world we live
in. This does not mean we need to be skeptics or pessimists, or try
and logically think everything out, it simply means we should look to
understand our information and FEEL whether is bares truth. We need
not memorize information we receive from authority figures, it is a
choice, one we can all make from here on out."


Circular reasoning, also known as 'Begging the question'
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html
eg of Begging the Question
Bill: "God must exist."
Jill: "How do you know."
Bill: "Because the Bible says so."
Jill: "Why should I believe the Bible?"
Bill: "Because the Bible was written by God [and god never lies]"



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Government Shill #2
2017-04-30 00:52:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
Would you care to tell us your understanding of this "theory" in a couple of
paragraphs. If you peak my interest I might consider watching an hour and a half
long video. Maybe.

Frankly, from your title, it's sounds like nonsense to me. I have never hear
"mainstream science" mention it, let alone be baffled by it.

Shill #2
--
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning,
confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild
and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous
something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be.
Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
Bob Officer
2017-04-30 19:17:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It isn't a theory. It isn't even a hypothesis. It a blind speculation
without any of evidence to even start to validate it.

If the earth was growing in size, what is a mechanism? Is the earth
becoming more massive? Then the moon would be getting closer, not farther
away.
Post by Government Shill #2
Would you care to tell us your understanding of this "theory" in a couple of
paragraphs. If you peak my interest I might consider watching an hour and a half
long video. Maybe.
Frankly, from your title, it's sounds like nonsense to me. I have never hear
"mainstream science" mention it, let alone be baffled by it.
Only she is baffled...
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning,
confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild
and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous
something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be.
Isaac Asimov - The Roving Mind (1983)
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Government Shill #2
2017-04-30 21:07:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It isn't a theory. It isn't even a hypothesis. It a blind speculation
without any of evidence to even start to validate it.
If the earth was growing in size, what is a mechanism? Is the earth
becoming more massive? Then the moon would be getting closer, not farther
away.
Post by Government Shill #2
Would you care to tell us your understanding of this "theory" in a couple of
paragraphs. If you peak my interest I might consider watching an hour and a half
long video. Maybe.
Frankly, from your title, it's sounds like nonsense to me. I have never hear
"mainstream science" mention it, let alone be baffled by it.
Only she is baffled...
I believe that.

Shill #2
--
Them™
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
K Wills (Shill #3)
2017-05-01 08:36:42 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 May 2017 07:07:30 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It isn't a theory. It isn't even a hypothesis. It a blind speculation
without any of evidence to even start to validate it.
If the earth was growing in size, what is a mechanism? Is the earth
becoming more massive? Then the moon would be getting closer, not farther
away.
Post by Government Shill #2
Would you care to tell us your understanding of this "theory" in a couple of
paragraphs. If you peak my interest I might consider watching an hour and a half
long video. Maybe.
Frankly, from your title, it's sounds like nonsense to me. I have never hear
"mainstream science" mention it, let alone be baffled by it.
Only she is baffled...
I believe that.
The evidence is cumulative and undeniable. As such, it is
impossible not to believe it.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
K Wills (Shill #3)
2017-04-30 01:23:14 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It only makes sense to the permanently baffled.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
Loading Image...
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Fred's brain fungus
2017-04-30 18:16:00 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird, since they are actually attached to the earth and not free
floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water. Its never
made much sense to me, but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.

eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?



BTW It seems that the group sci.geo.geology has been terminated. No
use trying to post there any more.


--
Fred's brain fungus
Brought to you by big pharma, where only the best propaganda will do

Attacking any remedies that can't be patented on behalf of big pharma

The war is on and the frontline's your brain.

Collusion Between Pharmaceutical Industry and Government Deepens
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/02/merck-flu-vaccine-conflicts.aspx

"The Drug Industry - commonly called Big Pharma, has no ethical
restrictions. The death, or damage, of millions of humans is of no
concern to them until that information about that damage and death
becomes public. They have been caught too many times to deny it. That
damage and death is, to them, just part of doing business. There has
never been a time when a Big Pharma drug lord has seen the inside of a
prison cell, much less been put on trial, and condemned to death for
what they did, like what happened to a former Chinese FDA leader. So,
there are NO ETHICAL INCENTIVES. - See more at:
http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/antivaccine%20yes.htm#sthash.W7pQ3K4E.dpuf

Unfortunately it is very profitable for the drug industry to get the
medical profession to promote vaccines to the general population. Drug
companies are corporations and they do not have a duty to “do no
harm”. Their only duty is to make money and “mitigate” any liability
the company might be forced to deal with in a court of law. And since
the Supreme Court decision in 2011, Bruecewitz versus Wyeth, they have
been exempted from all liability regarding their vaccine products. It
is important the public doesn’t forget this as it is very unlikely
your physician or anyone who works for public health will remind you
of this reality.
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2015/03/02/cdc-who-and-big-pharma-a-network-of-corruption/



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Bob Officer
2017-04-30 20:11:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird, since they are actually attached to the earth and not free
floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water. Its never
made much sense to me, but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
The data from GPS monitors show that you idea is wrong.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
Because the spreading mid-Ocean ridges. They only match in one place.

If the earth were expanding there would be no ocean basins or mountain
ranges. Partially blow up a balloon. Paint it with latex paint with a
smooth finish and then blow it up some more. The paint will crack as the
balloon inflates. But the paint will remain more or less smooth. Also the
point is that additional matter to inflate the balloon comes from where?
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
BTW It seems that the group sci.geo.geology has been terminated. No
use trying to post there any more.
Actually the group is still there, it is your server which no longer
carries it.

There you go trying to think again, Carole.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Duncan
2017-05-01 00:31:25 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird, since they are actually attached to the earth and not free
floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water. Its never
made much sense to me, but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
The data from GPS monitors show that you idea is wrong.
Mainstream disinformation bob.
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
Because the spreading mid-Ocean ridges. They only match in one place.
If the earth were expanding there would be no ocean basins or mountain
ranges. Partially blow up a balloon. Paint it with latex paint with a
smooth finish and then blow it up some more. The paint will crack as the
balloon inflates. But the paint will remain more or less smooth.
Scientists only speculate how mountains are formed, they don't really
know.
http://www.xearththeory.com/growing-mountain-ranges/
"Geology and science suggest mountains getting taller are explained by
the plate tectonics theory – the collision of continents – pushing up
the land where they meet. You have to remember that this is only a
theory, which was controversial in its own time only a few decades
ago, and is still being modified.

And for geologists it really is still guess work about what is
happening on the surface let alone in and deep under the ground. Let
alone estimating or guessing what mountains were like in the past."
Post by Bob Officer
Also the
point is that additional matter to inflate the balloon comes from where?
You've just answered that question for me ... a balloon can be liked
to a hollow earth.
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
BTW It seems that the group sci.geo.geology has been terminated. No
use trying to post there any more.
Actually the group is still there, it is your server which no longer
carries it.
Who's server doesn't carry it?
I personally don't have a server.
Post by Bob Officer
There you go trying to think again, Carole.
--
Duncan

"Consensus is not a scientific term. It is a political term." (Ed. The
Climate Skeptics (TCS) Blog)

"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There
are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we
don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we
don't know we don't know." -- Donald Rumsfeld
Post by Bob Officer
[BOB] "Beliefs are not opinions."
I think you will find that "belief" is a synonym for "opinion".
So WTF are you trying to say idiot?
[BOB] "I stand by what I said in context. A belief is
something held true with or without supporting
evidence or in the face of contradictory evidence.

An opinion is based on what one thinks and not what
one believes. Ones religion is what one believes.
Religion requires no thinking and in many cases
Religion forbids thinking.

While you might believe their are interchangeable
synonyms, I think if you asked an expert in the
English Language they might agree with me. The
words have different meanings and uses."
--------

">I didn't know there was a requirement to generate topics. Where did
Post by Bob Officer
you get that idiotic idea from. " -- Bob Officer
DK: Bob Officer is a member of the group I
DK; accurately describe as...
PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF)
http://www.psicounsel.com/bobofficer.html

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Bob Officer
2017-05-01 18:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Duncan
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird, since they are actually attached to the earth and not free
floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water. Its never
made much sense to me, but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
The data from GPS monitors show that you idea is wrong.
Mainstream disinformation bob.
GPS data is misinformation?

How does that work?
Post by Duncan
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
Because the spreading mid-Ocean ridges. They only match in one place.
If the earth were expanding there would be no ocean basins or mountain
ranges. Partially blow up a balloon. Paint it with latex paint with a
smooth finish and then blow it up some more. The paint will crack as the
balloon inflates. But the paint will remain more or less smooth.
Scientists only speculate how mountains are formed, they don't really
know.
http://www.xearththeory.com/growing-mountain-ranges/
"Geology and science suggest mountains getting taller are explained by
the plate tectonics theory – the collision of continents – pushing up
the land where they meet. You have to remember that this is only a
theory, which was controversial in its own time only a few decades
ago, and is still being modified.
And for geologists it really is still guess work about what is
happening on the surface let alone in and deep under the ground. Let
alone estimating or guessing what mountains were like in the past."
Except there is no mechanism and no observed expansion. There a host of
boundary collisions and subduction which is observed. The fact of observed
subduction taking place rules out expanding earth speculation.
Post by Duncan
Post by Bob Officer
Also the
point is that additional matter to inflate the balloon comes from where?
You've just answered that question for me ... a balloon can be liked
to a hollow earth.
No the balloon is not "hollow" it is full of air and you are increasing the
volume of the interior by adding more substance. The balloon could have
been filed with water, oil or even mercury for this example, we needed a
way to provide a mechanism for the increase. If the fiction balloon
flexible and could withstand the temperatures, you could use molten iron.

If expanding earth was true surface would stretch out and be completely
flat
Post by Duncan
Post by Bob Officer
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
BTW It seems that the group sci.geo.geology has been terminated. No
use trying to post there any more.
Actually the group is still there, it is your server which no longer
carries it.
Who's server doesn't carry it?
I personally don't have a server.
The news server you subscribe to and use, easynews.com
Post by Duncan
Post by Bob Officer
There you go trying to think again, Carole.
--
Duncan
"Consensus is not a scientific term. It is a political term." (Ed. The
Climate Skeptics (TCS) Blog)
"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There
are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we
don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we
don't know we don't know." -- Donald Rumsfeld
Post by Bob Officer
[BOB] "Beliefs are not opinions."
I think you will find that "belief" is a synonym for "opinion".
So WTF are you trying to say idiot?
[BOB] "I stand by what I said in context. A belief is
something held true with or without supporting
evidence or in the face of contradictory evidence.
An opinion is based on what one thinks and not what
one believes. Ones religion is what one believes.
Religion requires no thinking and in many cases
Religion forbids thinking.
While you might believe their are interchangeable
synonyms, I think if you asked an expert in the
English Language they might agree with me. The
words have different meanings and uses."
--------
">I didn't know there was a requirement to generate topics. Where did
Post by Bob Officer
you get that idiotic idea from. " -- Bob Officer
DK: Bob Officer is a member of the group I
DK; accurately describe as...
PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF)
http://www.psicounsel.com/bobofficer.html
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Government Shill #2
2017-04-30 23:28:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and not free floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water.
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
Loading Image...

Shill #2
--
Them™
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
Duncan
2017-05-01 02:27:00 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 May 2017 09:28:25 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and not free floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water.
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
When I say it never made sense, what I'm referring to is how can the
continents move while still holding their shape. They are attached to
the earth, so how do they move?
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
The way Maxlow shows it with his diagrams, is that when you take away
the gaps made along the trenches between continents, the coastlines
join up exactly. It seems to be indusputable that they once were
joined together. How else would these coastlines be such a perfect
match?



--
Duncan

"Consensus is not a scientific term. It is a political term." (Ed. The
Climate Skeptics (TCS) Blog)

"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There
are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we
don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we
don't know we don't know." -- Donald Rumsfeld
Post by Government Shill #2
[BOB] "Beliefs are not opinions."
I think you will find that "belief" is a synonym for "opinion".
So WTF are you trying to say idiot?
[BOB] "I stand by what I said in context. A belief is
something held true with or without supporting
evidence or in the face of contradictory evidence.

An opinion is based on what one thinks and not what
one believes. Ones religion is what one believes.
Religion requires no thinking and in many cases
Religion forbids thinking.

While you might believe their are interchangeable
synonyms, I think if you asked an expert in the
English Language they might agree with me. The
words have different meanings and uses."
--------

">I didn't know there was a requirement to generate topics. Where did
Post by Government Shill #2
you get that idiotic idea from. " -- Bob Officer
DK: Bob Officer is a member of the group I
DK; accurately describe as...
PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF)
http://www.psicounsel.com/bobofficer.html

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Government Shill #2
2017-05-01 03:04:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Duncan
On Mon, 01 May 2017 09:28:25 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and not free floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water.
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
When I say it never made sense,
Are you Fred's brain fungus?
Post by Duncan
what I'm referring to is how can the
continents move while still holding their shape. They are attached to
the earth, so how do they move?
The plate that the continent (or part of a continent) sits on moves. The
continent is only the top surface of a plate. The roof of your car doesn't
change shape when it moves along the road.


Loading Image...
Australia is the top surface of the Australian Plate and moves with it.
Africa is the top surface of the African Plate and moves with it.
North American is the top surface of the North American Plate and moves with it.
Eurasia the top surface of the Eurasian Plate and moves with it.
Post by Duncan
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
The way Maxlow shows it with his diagrams, is that when you take away
the gaps made along the trenches between continents, the coastlines
join up exactly. It seems to be indusputable that they once were
joined together. How else would these coastlines be such a perfect
match?
Yes. Some of the continents were once joined together. In a super continent
called Pangaea. That is what the picture shows
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif

Shill #2
--
Them™
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
Lu
2017-05-03 01:58:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Duncan
On Mon, 01 May 2017 09:28:25 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by The Newest Other Guy
On Mon, 01 May 2017 04:16:00 +1000, Fred's brain fungus
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and not free floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water.
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
When I say it never made sense,
Are you Fred's brain fungus?
and Duncan and a few others. She has more then 20 socks.
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Duncan
what I'm referring to is how can the
continents move while still holding their shape. They are attached to
the earth, so how do they move?
The plate that the continent (or part of a continent) sits on moves. The
continent is only the top surface of a plate. The roof of your car doesn't
change shape when it moves along the road.
http://cdn.whatarethe7continents.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/tectonic-plate
s-map-world.png
Australia is the top surface of the Australian Plate and moves with it.
Africa is the top surface of the African Plate and moves with it.
North American is the top surface of the North American Plate and moves with it.
Eurasia the top surface of the Eurasian Plate and moves with it.
Post by Duncan
Post by The Newest Other Guy
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
The way Maxlow shows it with his diagrams, is that when you take away
the gaps made along the trenches between continents, the coastlines
join up exactly. It seems to be indusputable that they once were
joined together. How else would these coastlines be such a perfect
match?
Yes. Some of the continents were once joined together. In a super continent
called Pangaea. That is what the picture shows
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
Bob Officer
2017-05-01 18:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Duncan
On Mon, 01 May 2017 09:28:25 +1000, Government Shill #2
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and not free floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water.
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
When I say it never made sense, what I'm referring to is how can the
continents move while still holding their shape. They are attached to
the earth, so how do they move?
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
The way Maxlow shows it with his diagrams, is that when you take away
the gaps made along the trenches between continents, the coastlines
join up exactly. It seems to be indusputable that they once were
joined together. How else would these coastlines be such a perfect
match?
And now one is disputing the fact they were once jointed. The dispute is
over the unsupported nonsense of an expanding earth.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Bob Officer
2017-05-01 18:29:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
I saw a map which showed the current vectors of the plate movements. GPS is
really a good thing it seems.
The following article has it all wrapped up and puts a bow on it.

http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1997/ZhenHuang.shtml
Post by Government Shill #2
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
Things not making sense, is the usual for Carole. This is just one of
sock-puppets.
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
eg if tectonic plates move around what is the mechanism that makes
them move
Convection currents. http://gamediv1.weebly.com/mantle.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
and why do the outlines of the continents seem to match?
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/eoc/teachers/t_tectonics/images/pangaea_gond.gif
Shill #2
--
Them™
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Government Shill #2
2017-05-01 21:59:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
I saw a map which showed the current vectors of the plate movements. GPS is
really a good thing it seems.
The following article has it all wrapped up and puts a bow on it.
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1997/ZhenHuang.shtml
Facts? kOOkers don't need facts! :-)
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
Things not making sense, is the usual for Carole. This is just one of
sock-puppets.
Oh! These are all Carole? Fred's... and Duncan? No wonder they share the same
dumb idea. I thought I was dealing with multiple loons.

Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
Bob Officer
2017-05-02 07:03:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird,
It does seem a bit weird, but that doesn't stop it from being true.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
since they are actually attached to the earth
Attached to the earth? That is a meaningless statement. They are the earth.
Tectonic plate are the top surface of the earth. The crust. The crust which is
made up of several plates. Plates which can be shown to be drifting across the
next lower level of the earth, the mantle.
I saw a map which showed the current vectors of the plate movements. GPS is
really a good thing it seems.
The following article has it all wrapped up and puts a bow on it.
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1997/ZhenHuang.shtml
Facts? kOOkers don't need facts! :-)
Well they are kooks, and kooks have a huge immunity to facts.
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Government Shill #2
http://gamediv1.weebly.com/tectonic-plate-movement.html
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Its never made much sense to me,
Which doesn't show it's false.
Things not making sense, is the usual for Carole. This is just one of
sock-puppets.
Oh! These are all Carole? Fred's... and Duncan? No wonder they share the same
dumb idea. I thought I was dealing with multiple loons.
Same loony. All socks of Carole.
Post by Government Shill #2
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
The Newest Other Guy
2017-05-01 03:19:25 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 May 2017 04:16:00 +1000, Fred's brain fungus
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge
Well, THAT'S TRUE!!
K Wills (Shill #3)
2017-05-01 08:35:57 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 01 May 2017 04:16:00 +1000, Fred's brain fungus
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:23:57 +1000, A little knowledge
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
I don't pretend to have much knowledge of geology but the idea of
tectonic plates moving north, south or any other way seems to be a bit
weird, since they are actually attached to the earth and not free
floating like a rubber ducky in a bathtub full of water. Its never
made much sense to me, but the idea of expanding earth does seem to
explain things more naturally.
Only with those for whom reality is too scary.

[,,,]
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Bob Officer
2017-04-30 19:17:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
--
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
"The U.S. government does not study anything holistically. Everything
is studied in isolation from all else."
-- The Open-Source Everything Manifesto: Transparency, Truth, and
Trust (Manifesto Series) by Robert David Steele
http://www.phibetaiota.net/2014/05/robert-steele-at-libtechnyc-the-open-source-everything-manifesto/
Some people get upset when they are removed because they failed their psych
evaluation.


None of what he writes is true, because if it was he would have been put
into prison long ago.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity

Thomas Heger
2017-04-30 20:40:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.

(Unfortunately it is only available in German).

I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.

As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.

The reason:

Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.

This can be easily seen in many landscapes.

For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.

Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.

There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.

The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.

So what?

TH
K Wills (Shill #3)
2017-05-01 08:36:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.
(Unfortunately it is only available in German).
I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.
As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.
No, it's not. And it's been explained to you why. Many times.
Post by Thomas Heger
Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.
As does climate change. The difference there is evidence of
climate change.
Post by Thomas Heger
This can be easily seen in many landscapes.
For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.
And?
Over the centuries, the plates have moved, causing it to be
further away than it once was.
Post by Thomas Heger
Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.
And?
Post by Thomas Heger
There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.
The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.
So what?
What is it about reality to despise so much, Thomas?
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
Bob Officer
2017-05-01 19:01:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.
(Unfortunately it is only available in German).
I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.
As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.
No, it's not. And it's been explained to you why. Many times.
By many different people.
Thomas is one of people you pat on the head and hope they don't reproduce.
Luckily Thomas seems to bat for the "other" team.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Post by Thomas Heger
Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.
As does climate change. The difference there is evidence of
climate change.
Post by Thomas Heger
This can be easily seen in many landscapes.
For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.
And?
Over the centuries, the plates have moved, causing it to be
further away than it once was.
Post by Thomas Heger
Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.
And?
Both are in well known seismically active areas, but Thomas ignores facts
when they get in the way of his own fantasies.
Post by K Wills (Shill #3)
Post by Thomas Heger
There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.
The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.
So what?
What is it about reality to despise so much, Thomas?
In his fantasy world he is a successful engineer and pub owner. Sadly he is
neither.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Bob Officer
2017-05-01 18:25:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.
(Unfortunately it is only available in German).
I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.
As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.
Except it has no mechanism for the expansion.
Post by Thomas Heger
Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.
This can be easily seen in many landscapes.
For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.
Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.
There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.
The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.
Thomas, and expanding earth would have a uniform surface. There would be no
mountains except for volcanos.
Post by Thomas Heger
So what?
Your are still and idiot.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Thomas Heger
2017-05-04 17:40:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.
(Unfortunately it is only available in German).
I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.
As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.
Except it has no mechanism for the expansion.
Hilgenberg didn't need a mechanism, since he was a geologist, not a
physicist.

But I could provide a mechanism. It is a concept I call 'structured
spacetime'.

It is more or less my invention and wanted to use Growing Earth as proof
of concept (for what I had invented).

You can read about in my nice 'book' on Google.docs:

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6

I could use other examples, but 'Growing Earth' works best.

If the Earth would grow, this would disprove certain assumptions, which
are believed to be valid - like big bang nucleosynthesis.

The entire particle-concept is actually, what I try to disprove.

According to my concept particles are certain 'structures' of/in
spacetime (hence 'structured spacetime').
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Thomas Heger
Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.
This can be easily seen in many landscapes.
For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.
Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.
There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.
The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.
Thomas, and expanding earth would have a uniform surface. There would be no
mountains except for volcanos.
NO!

Underwater volcanoes tend to rise to the surface, since water cools
fast. Once the sea-level drops, you have mountains.

TH
Bob Officer
2017-05-05 05:39:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by A little knowledge
Expanding Earth Theory - Growing Earth is Still Baffling Mainstream
Science
http://youtu.be/SdQWipgf4B4
This is a theory that makes sense unlike the disinformation taught by
mainstream.
It was actually invented by a German Geologist named Ott Christoph
Hilgenberg, who wrote a book call 'Vom wachsenden Erdball'.
(Unfortunately it is only available in German).
I have spend a lot of time on this subject and have participated in Neal
Adam's mailing list discussion for some time.
As far as I can tell, the concept of 'Growing Earth' is correct.
Except it has no mechanism for the expansion.
Hilgenberg didn't need a mechanism, since he was a geologist, not a
physicist.
Bullshit Thomas that is utter nonsense. For it to move become nonsensical
speculation he needs observations and a possible mechanism. Because there
already exist a abundance of observed plate boundaries where subduction
occurs, Hilgenberg needs some real serious data which does not have. And
without a mechanism or source for additional matter or cause agent for the
claimed expansion, and some sort of other supporting evidence negating the
observed subjection and the accompanying rises, you have nothing.
Post by Thomas Heger
But I could provide a mechanism. It is a concept I call 'structured
spacetime'.
Stick to you poor engineering, I pointed six major logical and conceptual
flaws in the past.
Post by Thomas Heger
It is more or less my invention and wanted to use Growing Earth as proof
of concept (for what I had invented).
You invented nothing. No evidence no data and zero observations. You don't
even have any grounds to even call it speculation. It is called nonsensical
fantasy.
Post by Thomas Heger
https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
I could use other examples, but 'Growing Earth' works best.
If the Earth would grow, this would disprove certain assumptions, which
are believed to be valid - like big bang nucleosynthesis.
The entire particle-concept is actually, what I try to disprove.
According to my concept particles are certain 'structures' of/in
spacetime (hence 'structured spacetime').
I read you "book", is flawed right from the 1st paragraph, with a already
falsified assumption. It would get tossed if this were a real thesis.
Post by Thomas Heger
Post by Bob Officer
Post by Thomas Heger
Growing Earth causes falling see-levels.
This can be easily seen in many landscapes.
For instance the city of Troy sits now on a hill, 5 km away from the
Dardanelles, which Troy once controlled.
Or the 'Trajan's Lake' in Fiomicino was once Rome's harbour, but is now
8m above the level of the Mediterranean sea.
There are tons of other examples, where former oceans had to be higher
than they are now.
The idea is rejected, since it violates certain dogmas, which -
apparently - should be maintained.
Thomas, and expanding earth would have a uniform surface. There would be no
mountains except for volcanos.
NO!
Yes. Take any crumpled material grasp the edges and pull. If the crumples
were Mountains and now flat ground.
Post by Thomas Heger
Underwater volcanoes tend to rise to the surface, since water cools
fast. Once the sea-level drops, you have mountains.
99% of Mountains are not volcanic in nature. How many of the Mountian's in
the alps are volcanic in nature?

Stick to running your pub. Ops you couldn't even do that right, could you.
--
Dunning's work explained in clear, concise and simple terms.
John Cleese on Stupidity
http://youtu.be/wvVPdyYeaQU
Loading...