homeopathy verdicts.

[Bob Officer]

https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-verdicts-prove-it/

[For obvious reasons]

On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-verdicts-prove-it/

-------------------
Refutations

1. ‘The principles of homeopathy contradict known chemical,
physical and biological laws and persuasive scientific trials proving
its effectiveness are not available.’
Russian Academy of Sciences

So what? Are the current scientific laws right? What homeopathic
remedy works for one person might not work for another. The homeopath
takes the totality of the symptoms before prescribing the remedy. This
is not how modern medicine prescribes where a remedy is prescribed for
a condition regardless.
The current testing system isn't right for homeopathy.
But if there were a group of patients treated for their conditions by
homeopathy or allopathic, then followed to see which ones were better
off, it would be a better system. All this double blind testing isn't
very helpful, and the placebo effect has been debunked. (Don't believe
this, do a search for "placebo effect debunked" ) Its a bit pharma
ploy to keep it all mysterious and manipulable.


2. ‘Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that
are chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose
homeopathy may put their health at risk if they reject or delay
treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and
effectiveness.’
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

Homeopathy does best to treat chronic disease where modern medicine
can never find a cure, merely treat conditions indefinitely as patient
deteriorates and gradually declines.
I don't really think that these health councils and research
institutes know what they're talking about. All they know is what
they've been mentally manipulated to know. People need to forget
everything they learn and just do their own research.


3. ‘These products are not supported by scientific evidence.’
Health Canada

So what?
Neither is most of modern allopathic medicine.
But there is scientific research that supports homeopathy - its gets
ignored or pushed aside. They claim that homeopathic substances are
inert, that there is nothing left of the original substance so it
cannot work.
However, when you consider that there is no such thing as solid
matter, that everything is made up of energy swirling at different
speeds and different frequencies, then it isn't too hard to believe
that it is the essence of the substance that is infused into the water
by the way homeopathic remedies are made. They are succussed or shaken
during the process which imparts the essence into the water. It is the
essence or the vibrations that have the influence.


4 “Homeopathic remedies don’t meet the criteria of evidence based
medicine.”
Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Its all rigged by mainstream "experts" who have vested interests.
Big pharma would go broke if homeopathy was mainstream.


5. ‘The incorporation of anthroposophical and homeopathic products
in the Swedish directive on medicinal products would run counter to
several of the fundamental principles regarding medicinal products and
evidence-based medicine.’
Swedish Academy of Sciences

6. ‘We recommend parents and caregivers not give homeopathic
teething tablets and gels to children and seek advice from their
healthcare professional for safe alternatives.’
US Food and Drug Administration

Why not?


7. ‘There is little evidence to support homeopathy as an effective
treatment for any specific condition.’
National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, US

Don't agree.


8. ‘There is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective
as a treatment for any health condition.’
National Health Service, UK

Don't agree.


9. ‘Homeopathic remedies perform no better than placebos, and the
principles on which homeopathy is based are scientifically
implausible.’
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, UK

Not true.


10. ‘Homeopathy has not definitively proven its efficacy in any
specific indication or clinical situation.’
Ministry of Health, Spain

Misinformation.


11. ‘There is a constant increase in the quantity of evidence and
the conviction of the scientific community in medicine, that
homeopathy should be treated as one of the unscientific methods of
so-called “alternative medicine”, which proposes worthless products
without scientifically proven efficacy.’
National Medical Council, Poland

The only thing scientific is modern allopathic medicine.


12. ‘From a purely clinical perspective, the fact remains that
there is no valid empirical proof? of the efficacy of homeopathy
(evidence-based medicine) beyond the placebo effect.’
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Belgium

People are brain washed into holding this view for fear of ridicule.


--
For obvious reasons

Why modern healthcare is in such a shambles
http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com.au/2014/06/the-ph-miracle-for-cancer.html

1953 Fitzgerald Report - Suppressed Cancer Treatments
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2007/04/03/1953_fitzgerald_report_suppressed_cancer_treatments.htm

A conspiracy to destroy natural medicine and profit from sickness and
disease
The history of medical suppression in America can be traced back to
the Rockefeller Foundation and the rise of the American Medical
Association, led by a sociopathic, arrogant huckster named Dr.
Fishbein. Working in conspiracy to destroy natural medicine and
chiropractic medicine, these criminal institutions gave rise to
allopathic medicine which is currently responsible for the mass
killing of at least one million people per year.
http://www.naturalnews.com/052981_medical_monopoly_government_censorship_marijuana.html


Can My Doctor Get Into Big Legal Trouble by Offering Natural Health
Treatments?
http://www.anh-usa.org/readers-corner-can-doctor-get-into-trouble-offering-natural-treatments/

"Bad research rising: The 7th Olympiad of research on biomedical
publication
What do the editors of medical journals talk about when they get
together? So far today, it’s been a fascinating but rather grim
mixture of research that can’t be replicated, dodgy authorship,
plagiarism and duplicate papers, and the general rottenness of
citations as a measure of scientific impact."
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/absolutely-maybe/2013/09/08/bad-research-rising-the-7th-olympiad-of-research-on-biomedical-publication/

"Bad research rising: The 7th Olympiad of research on biomedical
publication
Why is there so much un-reproducible research? Ioannidis points to the
many sources of bias in research. Chavalarias and he trawled through
more than 17 million articles in PubMed and found discussion of 235
different kinds of bias. There is so much bias, he said, that it makes
one of his dreams – an encyclopedia of bias – a supremely daunting
task."
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/absolutely-maybe/2013/09/08/bad-research-rising-the-7th-olympiad-of-research-on-biomedical-publication/



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[⊙＿⊙]

How patients built up the practice of the lay homeopath Clemens von Bönninghausen. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of patient history


http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0211-95362011000200011

[Bob Officer]

Post by For obvious reasons
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-verdicts-prove-it/

-------------------
Refutations
1. ‘The principles of homeopathy contradict known chemical,
physical and biological laws and persuasive scientific trials proving
its effectiveness are not available.’
Russian Academy of Sciences
So what? Are the current scientific laws right?

Yes they are right.

Post by For obvious reasons
What homeopathic
remedy works for one person might not work for another. The homeopath
takes the totality of the symptoms before prescribing the remedy. This
is not how modern medicine prescribes where a remedy is prescribed for
a condition regardless.

The problems homeopathic remedies do not work. There is Zero evidence the
support that claim.

Post by For obvious reasons
The current testing system isn't right for homeopathy.
But if there were a group of patients treated for their conditions by
homeopathy or allopathic, then followed to see which ones were better
off, it would be a better system. All this double blind testing isn't
very helpful, and the placebo effect has been debunked. (Don't believe
this, do a search for "placebo effect debunked" ) Its a bit pharma
ploy to keep it all mysterious and manipulable.
2. ‘Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that
are chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose
homeopathy may put their health at risk if they reject or delay
treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and
effectiveness.’
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Homeopathy does best to treat chronic disease where modern medicine
can never find a cure, merely treat conditions indefinitely as patient
deteriorates and gradually declines.
I don't really think that these health councils and research
institutes know what they're talking about. All they know is what
they've been mentally manipulated to know. People need to forget
everything they learn and just do their own research.
3. ‘These products are not supported by scientific evidence.’
Health Canada
So what?
Neither is most of modern allopathic medicine.
But there is scientific research that supports homeopathy - its gets
ignored or pushed aside. They claim that homeopathic substances are
inert, that there is nothing left of the original substance so it
cannot work.
However, when you consider that there is no such thing as solid
matter, that everything is made up of energy swirling at different
speeds and different frequencies, then it isn't too hard to believe
that it is the essence of the substance that is infused into the water
by the way homeopathic remedies are made. They are succussed or shaken
during the process which imparts the essence into the water. It is the
essence or the vibrations that have the influence.
4 “Homeopathic remedies don’t meet the criteria of evidence based
medicine.”
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Its all rigged by mainstream "experts" who have vested interests.
Big pharma would go broke if homeopathy was mainstream.
5. ‘The incorporation of anthroposophical and homeopathic products
in the Swedish directive on medicinal products would run counter to
several of the fundamental principles regarding medicinal products and
evidence-based medicine.’
Swedish Academy of Sciences
6. ‘We recommend parents and caregivers not give homeopathic
teething tablets and gels to children and seek advice from their
healthcare professional for safe alternatives.’
US Food and Drug Administration
Why not?
7. ‘There is little evidence to support homeopathy as an effective
treatment for any specific condition.’
National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, US
Don't agree.
8. ‘There is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective
as a treatment for any health condition.’
National Health Service, UK
Don't agree.
9. ‘Homeopathic remedies perform no better than placebos, and the
principles on which homeopathy is based are scientifically
implausible.’
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, UK
Not true.

Actually it 100% true. Have you ever seen homeopathic petrol?

Post by For obvious reasons
10. ‘Homeopathy has not definitively proven its efficacy in any
specific indication or clinical situation.’
Ministry of Health, Spain
Misinformation.
11. ‘There is a constant increase in the quantity of evidence and
the conviction of the scientific community in medicine, that
homeopathy should be treated as one of the unscientific methods of
so-called “alternative medicine”, which proposes worthless products
without scientifically proven efficacy.’
National Medical Council, Poland
The only thing scientific is modern allopathic medicine.
12. ‘From a purely clinical perspective, the fact remains that
there is no valid empirical proof? of the efficacy of homeopathy
(evidence-based medicine) beyond the placebo effect.’
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Belgium
People are brain washed into holding this view for fear of ridicule.

And some people just do not understand what they have read.

You are gullible.

[Blind Freddie]

On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 05:03:58 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-verdicts-prove-it/

-------------------
Refutations
1. ?The principles of homeopathy contradict known chemical,
physical and biological laws and persuasive scientific trials proving
its effectiveness are not available.?
Russian Academy of Sciences
So what? Are the current scientific laws right?

Yes they are right.

Except ... when they're wrong.

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
What homeopathic
remedy works for one person might not work for another. The homeopath
takes the totality of the symptoms before prescribing the remedy. This
is not how modern medicine prescribes where a remedy is prescribed for
a condition regardless.

The problems homeopathic remedies do not work. There is Zero evidence the
support that claim.

False statement.

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
The current testing system isn't right for homeopathy.
But if there were a group of patients treated for their conditions by
homeopathy or allopathic, then followed to see which ones were better
off, it would be a better system. All this double blind testing isn't
very helpful, and the placebo effect has been debunked. (Don't believe
this, do a search for "placebo effect debunked" ) Its a bit pharma
ploy to keep it all mysterious and manipulable.
2. ?Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that
are chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose
homeopathy may put their health at risk if they reject or delay
treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and
effectiveness.?
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Homeopathy does best to treat chronic disease where modern medicine
can never find a cure, merely treat conditions indefinitely as patient
deteriorates and gradually declines.
I don't really think that these health councils and research
institutes know what they're talking about. All they know is what
they've been mentally manipulated to know. People need to forget
everything they learn and just do their own research.
3. ?These products are not supported by scientific evidence.?
Health Canada
So what?
Neither is most of modern allopathic medicine.
But there is scientific research that supports homeopathy - its gets
ignored or pushed aside. They claim that homeopathic substances are
inert, that there is nothing left of the original substance so it
cannot work.
However, when you consider that there is no such thing as solid
matter, that everything is made up of energy swirling at different
speeds and different frequencies, then it isn't too hard to believe
that it is the essence of the substance that is infused into the water
by the way homeopathic remedies are made. They are succussed or shaken
during the process which imparts the essence into the water. It is the
essence or the vibrations that have the influence.
4 ?Homeopathic remedies don?t meet the criteria of evidence based
medicine.?
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Its all rigged by mainstream "experts" who have vested interests.
Big pharma would go broke if homeopathy was mainstream.
5. ?The incorporation of anthroposophical and homeopathic products
in the Swedish directive on medicinal products would run counter to
several of the fundamental principles regarding medicinal products and
evidence-based medicine.?
Swedish Academy of Sciences
6. ?We recommend parents and caregivers not give homeopathic
teething tablets and gels to children and seek advice from their
healthcare professional for safe alternatives.?
US Food and Drug Administration
Why not?
7. ?There is little evidence to support homeopathy as an effective
treatment for any specific condition.?
National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, US
Don't agree.
8. ?There is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective
as a treatment for any health condition.?
National Health Service, UK
Don't agree.
9. ?Homeopathic remedies perform no better than placebos, and the
principles on which homeopathy is based are scientifically
implausible.?
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, UK
Not true.

Actually it 100% true. Have you ever seen homeopathic petrol?

Homeopathy is a system of correcting body imbalances.
Are you saying that a car is a type of body imbalance?

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
10. ?Homeopathy has not definitively proven its efficacy in any
specific indication or clinical situation.?
Ministry of Health, Spain
Misinformation.
11. ?There is a constant increase in the quantity of evidence and
the conviction of the scientific community in medicine, that
homeopathy should be treated as one of the unscientific methods of
so-called ?alternative medicine?, which proposes worthless products
without scientifically proven efficacy.?
National Medical Council, Poland
The only thing scientific is modern allopathic medicine.
12. ?From a purely clinical perspective, the fact remains that
there is no valid empirical proof? of the efficacy of homeopathy
(evidence-based medicine) beyond the placebo effect.?
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Belgium
People are brain washed into holding this view for fear of ridicule.

And some people just do not understand what they have read.

And some people are just pawns of big pharma and go along with all
their propaganda.

Post by Bob Officer
You are gullible.

You're a moron.



--
Blind Freddie
"None so blind as those who will not see"

7 Massive Misconceptions Many Never Question
http://tinyurl.com/jg9jay3

A brief history of FDA raids against providers of natural health
products
https://thebovine.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/a-brief-history-of-fda-raids-against-providers-of-natural-health-products/

Tyranny in the USA: The true history of FDA raids on healers, vitamin
shops and supplement companies
http://www.naturalnews.com/021791.html

The Laws of the Pharmaceutical Industry
http://tinyurl.com/zgmi


DDT
"A former high official at the NSA (National Security Agency) told me
about a protocol informally dubbed DDT - that old poisonous chemical
long-banned in much of the world. In this application, it stands for
Decoy, Distract and Trash - which is what sophisticated intelligence
operatives use to set up some person or group, take them off the trail
of something real and important, and trash the person or the
subject." -- Stephen Greer.


Suppression of dissent in science
Brian Martin / Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, Volume 7
1999
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/Suppression-Dissent-Science.htm


Pan Pharmaceuticals
The founder of Pan Pharmaceuticals, the company which had its licence
withdrawn by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in 2003, has
received a record $50 million payout from the Federal Government.
- Founder 'blameless'
- 400 jobs lost
- Public inquiry wanted
Jim Selim had sued the TGA for compensation for ruining his business,
claiming public servants had acted outside their power and with
vengeance when withdrawing the licence after concerns over certain
products and manufacturing processes.
TGA shareholders lost $350 million, almost 400 people lost their jobs,
and Pan's customers lost hundreds of millions of dollars in business,
Mr Selim's lawyer Andrew Thorpe said outside the court today.
http://tinyurl.com/p8nkyco


Cover Stories invented to engineer public opinions
"Many people have been so concerned about what has been happening to
our Government that they have dedicated themselves to investigating
and exposing its evils. Unfortunately, a number of these writers have
been dupes of those cleverer than they or with sinister reasons for
concealing knowledge. They have written what they thought was the
truth, only to find out (if they ever did find out) that they had been
fed a lot of contrived cover stories and just plain hogwash. In this
book I have taken extracts from some of this writing and, line by
line, have shown how it has been manipulated to give a semblance of
truth while at the same time being contrived and false. " -- The
Secret Team, Fletcher L. Prouty,
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/USO/appA.html 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[Bob Officer]

Post by Blind Freddie
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 05:03:58 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-verdicts-prove-it/

-------------------
Refutations
1. ?The principles of homeopathy contradict known chemical,
physical and biological laws and persuasive scientific trials proving
its effectiveness are not available.?
Russian Academy of Sciences
So what? Are the current scientific laws right?

Yes they are right.

Except ... when they're wrong.

But Carole, the evidence and data says they are right. Nothing so far
observed shows that they are wrong.

Post by Blind Freddie

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
What homeopathic
remedy works for one person might not work for another. The homeopath
takes the totality of the symptoms before prescribing the remedy. This
is not how modern medicine prescribes where a remedy is prescribed for
a condition regardless.

The problems homeopathic remedies do not work. There is Zero evidence the
support that claim.

False statement.

The best evidence to support homeopathy was show to be observers bias. Once
the experiment was properly blinded, the result showed zero effect.

Post by Blind Freddie

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
The current testing system isn't right for homeopathy.
But if there were a group of patients treated for their conditions by
homeopathy or allopathic, then followed to see which ones were better
off, it would be a better system. All this double blind testing isn't
very helpful, and the placebo effect has been debunked. (Don't believe
this, do a search for "placebo effect debunked" ) Its a bit pharma
ploy to keep it all mysterious and manipulable.
2. ?Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that
are chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose
homeopathy may put their health at risk if they reject or delay
treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and
effectiveness.?
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Homeopathy does best to treat chronic disease where modern medicine
can never find a cure, merely treat conditions indefinitely as patient
deteriorates and gradually declines.
I don't really think that these health councils and research
institutes know what they're talking about. All they know is what
they've been mentally manipulated to know. People need to forget
everything they learn and just do their own research.
3. ?These products are not supported by scientific evidence.?
Health Canada
So what?
Neither is most of modern allopathic medicine.
But there is scientific research that supports homeopathy - its gets
ignored or pushed aside. They claim that homeopathic substances are
inert, that there is nothing left of the original substance so it
cannot work.
However, when you consider that there is no such thing as solid
matter, that everything is made up of energy swirling at different
speeds and different frequencies, then it isn't too hard to believe
that it is the essence of the substance that is infused into the water
by the way homeopathic remedies are made. They are succussed or shaken
during the process which imparts the essence into the water. It is the
essence or the vibrations that have the influence.
4 ?Homeopathic remedies don?t meet the criteria of evidence based
medicine.?
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Its all rigged by mainstream "experts" who have vested interests.
Big pharma would go broke if homeopathy was mainstream.
5. ?The incorporation of anthroposophical and homeopathic products
in the Swedish directive on medicinal products would run counter to
several of the fundamental principles regarding medicinal products and
evidence-based medicine.?
Swedish Academy of Sciences
6. ?We recommend parents and caregivers not give homeopathic
teething tablets and gels to children and seek advice from their
healthcare professional for safe alternatives.?
US Food and Drug Administration
Why not?
7. ?There is little evidence to support homeopathy as an effective
treatment for any specific condition.?
National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, US
Don't agree.
8. ?There is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective
as a treatment for any health condition.?
National Health Service, UK
Don't agree.
9. ?Homeopathic remedies perform no better than placebos, and the
principles on which homeopathy is based are scientifically
implausible.?
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, UK
Not true.

Actually it 100% true. Have you ever seen homeopathic petrol?

Homeopathy is a system of correcting body imbalances.

That's what it claims, it can not point out these imbalances. It even state
the true causes of these so-called imbalance are unknowable to mankind.

Post by Blind Freddie
Are you saying that a car is a type of body imbalance?

I am saying that is more dilute is more powerful, then a 100c homeopathic
dilution of gasoline should produce more mileage than 80octane gasoline.

It the basis of homeopathy, Carole.

Post by Blind Freddie

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
10. ?Homeopathy has not definitively proven its efficacy in any
specific indication or clinical situation.?
Ministry of Health, Spain
Misinformation.
11. ?There is a constant increase in the quantity of evidence and
the conviction of the scientific community in medicine, that
homeopathy should be treated as one of the unscientific methods of
so-called ?alternative medicine?, which proposes worthless products
without scientifically proven efficacy.?
National Medical Council, Poland
The only thing scientific is modern allopathic medicine.
12. ?From a purely clinical perspective, the fact remains that
there is no valid empirical proof? of the efficacy of homeopathy
(evidence-based medicine) beyond the placebo effect.?
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Belgium
People are brain washed into holding this view for fear of ridicule.

And some people just do not understand what they have read.

And some people are just pawns of big pharma and go along with all
their propaganda.

I understand what I have read. It seems you fail to understand most of what
you have read.

Post by Blind Freddie

Post by Bob Officer
You are gullible.

You're a moron.

That's doubtful.

[Lu]

Post by Blind Freddie
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 05:03:58 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer

Post by Bob Officer
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-debate-about-homeopathy-is-over-these-v
erdicts-prove-it/

-------------------
Refutations
1. ?The principles of homeopathy contradict known chemical,
physical and biological laws and persuasive scientific trials proving
its effectiveness are not available.?
Russian Academy of Sciences
So what? Are the current scientific laws right?

Yes they are right.

Except ... when they're wrong.

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
What homeopathic
remedy works for one person might not work for another. The homeopath
takes the totality of the symptoms before prescribing the remedy. This
is not how modern medicine prescribes where a remedy is prescribed for
a condition regardless.

The problems homeopathic remedies do not work. There is Zero evidence the
support that claim.

False statement.

So where is your evidence?

Post by Blind Freddie

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
The current testing system isn't right for homeopathy.
But if there were a group of patients treated for their conditions by
homeopathy or allopathic, then followed to see which ones were better
off, it would be a better system. All this double blind testing isn't
very helpful, and the placebo effect has been debunked. (Don't believe
this, do a search for "placebo effect debunked" ) Its a bit pharma
ploy to keep it all mysterious and manipulable.
2. ?Homeopathy should not be used to treat health conditions that
are chronic, serious, or could become serious. People who choose
homeopathy may put their health at risk if they reject or delay
treatments for which there is good evidence for safety and
effectiveness.?
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Homeopathy does best to treat chronic disease where modern medicine
can never find a cure, merely treat conditions indefinitely as patient
deteriorates and gradually declines.
I don't really think that these health councils and research
institutes know what they're talking about. All they know is what
they've been mentally manipulated to know. People need to forget
everything they learn and just do their own research.
3. ?These products are not supported by scientific evidence.?
Health Canada
So what?
Neither is most of modern allopathic medicine.
But there is scientific research that supports homeopathy - its gets
ignored or pushed aside. They claim that homeopathic substances are
inert, that there is nothing left of the original substance so it
cannot work.
However, when you consider that there is no such thing as solid
matter, that everything is made up of energy swirling at different
speeds and different frequencies, then it isn't too hard to believe
that it is the essence of the substance that is infused into the water
by the way homeopathic remedies are made. They are succussed or shaken
during the process which imparts the essence into the water. It is the
essence or the vibrations that have the influence.
4 ?Homeopathic remedies don?t meet the criteria of evidence based
medicine.?
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Its all rigged by mainstream "experts" who have vested interests.
Big pharma would go broke if homeopathy was mainstream.
5. ?The incorporation of anthroposophical and homeopathic products
in the Swedish directive on medicinal products would run counter to
several of the fundamental principles regarding medicinal products and
evidence-based medicine.?
Swedish Academy of Sciences
6. ?We recommend parents and caregivers not give homeopathic
teething tablets and gels to children and seek advice from their
healthcare professional for safe alternatives.?
US Food and Drug Administration
Why not?
7. ?There is little evidence to support homeopathy as an effective
treatment for any specific condition.?
National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health, US
Don't agree.
8. ?There is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective
as a treatment for any health condition.?
National Health Service, UK
Don't agree.
9. ?Homeopathic remedies perform no better than placebos, and the
principles on which homeopathy is based are scientifically
implausible.?
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, UK
Not true.

Actually it 100% true. Have you ever seen homeopathic petrol?

Homeopathy is a system of correcting body imbalances.
Are you saying that a car is a type of body imbalance?

Post by Bob Officer

Post by For obvious reasons
10. ?Homeopathy has not definitively proven its efficacy in any
specific indication or clinical situation.?
Ministry of Health, Spain
Misinformation.
11. ?There is a constant increase in the quantity of evidence and
the conviction of the scientific community in medicine, that
homeopathy should be treated as one of the unscientific methods of
so-called ?alternative medicine?, which proposes worthless products
without scientifically proven efficacy.?
National Medical Council, Poland
The only thing scientific is modern allopathic medicine.
12. ?From a purely clinical perspective, the fact remains that
there is no valid empirical proof? of the efficacy of homeopathy
(evidence-based medicine) beyond the placebo effect.?
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Belgium
People are brain washed into holding this view for fear of ridicule.

And some people just do not understand what they have read.

And some people are just pawns of big pharma and go along with all
their propaganda.

Post by Bob Officer
You are gullible.

You're a moron.