i***@herbalabode.com
2017-01-08 23:56:24 UTC
Doctors Kill More People
Than Guns and Traffic Accidents Combined
By Don Harkins
The Idaho Observer - April, 1999
SANDPOINT -- Last St. Patrick's Day, Sandpoint Chiropractor Blaze Welch gave
a lecture on how to get off of the disease scary-go-round at the Gardenia
Center here. The purpose of the talk, which was sponsored by the North
Idaho chapter of Vaccination Liberation, was to teach people that they are
responsible for their own health. Dr. Welch also discussed figures from
right out of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) which
prove, through accurate interpretations of their own words, that in the last
century we chose the wrong fork in the road with regard to our health care
paradigm.
Most people have been conditioned to believe in what is called the germ
theory of disease -- that germs cause disease. The truth is that germs
(bacteria) are everywhere and they are attracted to and proliferate in
dis-eased tissues. Bacteria decompose dead matter. That is their job. For
instance, when a tree dies, bacteria come in and eat the tree and it
eventually becomes soil. Bacteria do not eat a live, healthy tree. The
same thing is true in people -- bacteria are attracted to dead matter.
Therefore, if you have dead matter in your body, bacteria will come in and
get to work decomposing the dead tissue so that it may eventually become
soil. In the mid 1800s, western medical science had the choice of going one
of two ways. Bechamp's theory of disease maintained that every living thing
has arisen from the microzyma (the fundamental unit of the corporate
organism) and every living thing is reducible to the microzyma. Bechamp
believed that microzymas secrete fermentative substances that aid in
digestion in a healthy body and evolve into bacteria when they encounter
dead or damaged cells.
Pasteur's germ theory of disease maintained that diseases come into our
bodies and make germs that we must fight so that we may be rid of them. J.I.
Rodale explained Pasteur's germ theory of disease by stating that germs live
in the air, and every once in awhile get into a human body, multiply and
cause illness. Nothing to it at all. All you have to do is kill germs and
disease is licked.
Bechamp's theory placed all of the responsibility of disease prevention on
the individual and his lifestyle. In a practical sense, there was no money
in that and people would be empowered with the ability to resist dis-ease by
taking care of themselves. Western medical science went with Pasteur's
theory because it opened the door which created the world's medical and
pharmaceutical industries. Since the 1850s, we have been developing new
drugs to attack and kill the disease invaders and the result has been
epidemics of cancers and sicknesses and diseases -- and a very rich and
powerful pharmaceutical industry.
Last year, commented Dr. Welch, the pharmaceutical industry did $182 billion
in drug sales world wide. . . . Dr. Welch read off some statistics which
should cause concern to anybody who sees an allopathic doctor, has medical
insurance or may end up in the hospital someday. Again, the following
The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are tobacco,
alcohol, medical malpractice, traffic and firearms. According to JAMA,
doctors kill more people than auto accidents and guns. With that in mind,
one has to wonder why gun control is such a hot legislative issue when,
perhaps, we should be more concerned about doctor control.
The number of people that doctors kill per day from medical malpractice is
roughly equal to the amount of people that would die if every day, three
jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board, commented Dr. Welch who
added, in defense of his own profession, just imagine what headlines would
result if a chiropractor or a naturopath accidentally killed just one
patient?
Another JAMA statistic stated that 1/5 (20 percent) of all people who see an
allopath will suffer a doctor-induced injury.
Again, according to JAMA, 16 percent of all people who die in the hospital
are determined by autopsy to have died of something other than their
admission diagnosis. In other words, the doctor had no idea what was really
wrong with the patient and, therefore, the patient may have died for want of
appropriate care that would have been subsequent to an accurate diagnosis.
Another trade publication, American Medical News, stated that 28 percent of
people admitted to hospitals are there because they have suffered an adverse
reaction to prescribed drugs.
We are miserably losing the battle against viruses and bacteria.
Antibiotics do not work. We need to take a different tack because this is
obviously not working, said Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch made numerous practical
and logical observations throughout his lecture. One of them is so obvious
that it deserves mention here. When there is an epidemic of, say, pertussis
in a school and 14 of 200 kids get sick, who gets studied? he asked. The
answer, of course, is that the sick kids get studied. They get studied by
the county health district and the health district accumulates its data and
then tells the newspapers about the epidemic of sickness and everybody then
flocks down to the health district or goes to see their doctor to get
vaccinated.
Would it not be more appropriate to study the 186 kids that did not get
sick? I asked Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch also read a quote from the British
Medical Journal which states that only one percent of all scientific
research papers which explore medicine are scientifically sound.
So, if that is true, then not only are allopathic doctors incorrect in their
understanding of the basic nature of disease, they are basing 99 percent of
their conclusions, and therefore their diagnosis and treatment of people, on
flawed science.
The Idaho Observer P.O. Box 1353 Rathdrum, Idaho 83858-1353
http://proliberty.com/observer/
(Originally found at www.sightings.com)
--
W. S. Swanson, DC
Well I guess we could take it a step further and discuss the suspicious death of many holistic Drs, although thats for another day.Than Guns and Traffic Accidents Combined
By Don Harkins
The Idaho Observer - April, 1999
SANDPOINT -- Last St. Patrick's Day, Sandpoint Chiropractor Blaze Welch gave
a lecture on how to get off of the disease scary-go-round at the Gardenia
Center here. The purpose of the talk, which was sponsored by the North
Idaho chapter of Vaccination Liberation, was to teach people that they are
responsible for their own health. Dr. Welch also discussed figures from
right out of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) which
prove, through accurate interpretations of their own words, that in the last
century we chose the wrong fork in the road with regard to our health care
paradigm.
Most people have been conditioned to believe in what is called the germ
theory of disease -- that germs cause disease. The truth is that germs
(bacteria) are everywhere and they are attracted to and proliferate in
dis-eased tissues. Bacteria decompose dead matter. That is their job. For
instance, when a tree dies, bacteria come in and eat the tree and it
eventually becomes soil. Bacteria do not eat a live, healthy tree. The
same thing is true in people -- bacteria are attracted to dead matter.
Therefore, if you have dead matter in your body, bacteria will come in and
get to work decomposing the dead tissue so that it may eventually become
soil. In the mid 1800s, western medical science had the choice of going one
of two ways. Bechamp's theory of disease maintained that every living thing
has arisen from the microzyma (the fundamental unit of the corporate
organism) and every living thing is reducible to the microzyma. Bechamp
believed that microzymas secrete fermentative substances that aid in
digestion in a healthy body and evolve into bacteria when they encounter
dead or damaged cells.
Pasteur's germ theory of disease maintained that diseases come into our
bodies and make germs that we must fight so that we may be rid of them. J.I.
Rodale explained Pasteur's germ theory of disease by stating that germs live
in the air, and every once in awhile get into a human body, multiply and
cause illness. Nothing to it at all. All you have to do is kill germs and
disease is licked.
Bechamp's theory placed all of the responsibility of disease prevention on
the individual and his lifestyle. In a practical sense, there was no money
in that and people would be empowered with the ability to resist dis-ease by
taking care of themselves. Western medical science went with Pasteur's
theory because it opened the door which created the world's medical and
pharmaceutical industries. Since the 1850s, we have been developing new
drugs to attack and kill the disease invaders and the result has been
epidemics of cancers and sicknesses and diseases -- and a very rich and
powerful pharmaceutical industry.
Last year, commented Dr. Welch, the pharmaceutical industry did $182 billion
in drug sales world wide. . . . Dr. Welch read off some statistics which
should cause concern to anybody who sees an allopathic doctor, has medical
insurance or may end up in the hospital someday. Again, the following
The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are tobacco,
alcohol, medical malpractice, traffic and firearms. According to JAMA,
doctors kill more people than auto accidents and guns. With that in mind,
one has to wonder why gun control is such a hot legislative issue when,
perhaps, we should be more concerned about doctor control.
The number of people that doctors kill per day from medical malpractice is
roughly equal to the amount of people that would die if every day, three
jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board, commented Dr. Welch who
added, in defense of his own profession, just imagine what headlines would
result if a chiropractor or a naturopath accidentally killed just one
patient?
Another JAMA statistic stated that 1/5 (20 percent) of all people who see an
allopath will suffer a doctor-induced injury.
Again, according to JAMA, 16 percent of all people who die in the hospital
are determined by autopsy to have died of something other than their
admission diagnosis. In other words, the doctor had no idea what was really
wrong with the patient and, therefore, the patient may have died for want of
appropriate care that would have been subsequent to an accurate diagnosis.
Another trade publication, American Medical News, stated that 28 percent of
people admitted to hospitals are there because they have suffered an adverse
reaction to prescribed drugs.
We are miserably losing the battle against viruses and bacteria.
Antibiotics do not work. We need to take a different tack because this is
obviously not working, said Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch made numerous practical
and logical observations throughout his lecture. One of them is so obvious
that it deserves mention here. When there is an epidemic of, say, pertussis
in a school and 14 of 200 kids get sick, who gets studied? he asked. The
answer, of course, is that the sick kids get studied. They get studied by
the county health district and the health district accumulates its data and
then tells the newspapers about the epidemic of sickness and everybody then
flocks down to the health district or goes to see their doctor to get
vaccinated.
Would it not be more appropriate to study the 186 kids that did not get
sick? I asked Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch also read a quote from the British
Medical Journal which states that only one percent of all scientific
research papers which explore medicine are scientifically sound.
So, if that is true, then not only are allopathic doctors incorrect in their
understanding of the basic nature of disease, they are basing 99 percent of
their conclusions, and therefore their diagnosis and treatment of people, on
flawed science.
The Idaho Observer P.O. Box 1353 Rathdrum, Idaho 83858-1353
http://proliberty.com/observer/
(Originally found at www.sightings.com)
--
W. S. Swanson, DC